DeMoulin_Bros_Catalog No. 439; Burlesque and Side Degree...
Rated • 6 reviews • illusions • phoenixmasonry.org
Rated • 6 reviews • illusions • phoenixmasonry.org
Rated • 15 reviews • computer hardware • hacknmod.com
Rated • 22 reviews • cooking • forkableblog.com
Rated • 2 reviews • writing • associatedcontent.com
Rated • 10 reviews • culture • thefuntheory.com
Nice and kudos to them. My only complaint is that some of their evidence,the way it's presented, is not good science. The bottomless trash can's effectiveness was compared to a trash can just a short distance away. They should have compared the trash can to trash collection for the can before the modification, and to the whole park as a whole. The can's modification may not have increased over all litter control. It might have just caused more people to use THAT can over others in the park. Etc. Same statistical / scientific method issues cover the bottle recycling arcade machine. Did it really increase overall recycling or did the machine steal bottles from other recycling machines in the area? Still gave the whole thing the thumbs up, however.
Rated • 1 review • health • military.com