http://philosophy.eserver.org/kant-prolegomena.txt
Rated • 1 review • philosophy • eserver.org
- Stumble >
-
memeplexo/philosophy
Last seen: 4 hours ago
memeplexo is a 26 year old person from Porto Alegre, Brazil
post-apocalyptic pataphysical scholar [flog]
-
-
-
Willard Van Orman Quine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rated • 1 review • philosophy • wikipedia.org
-
Mem&rias do Neto de Dacum, o Abor&gene by Olav Swenson in...
Rated • 0 reviews • philosophy • lulu.com
-
-
-
& tzal.org &
Rated • 2 reviews • philosophy • tzal.org
"This sentence is only valid within an infinite set:
∀x¬Rxx ∧ ∀x∀y∀z(Rxy ∧ Ryz ⇒ Rxz) ∧ ∀x∃yRxy
where R equals "bigger than", this set is (at least) the natural numbers. If we change ∀x∃yRxy to ∀x∃y¬Rxy it not only becomes invalid, but contradictory. This shows validity implies infinity?"
the Dharma Bum has returned to the blogosphere. kudos for him.
