Rated
Dec 27 2008
•
1 review
•
environment, science, energy, economy
• nytimes.com
No Furnaces but Heat Aplenty in 'Passive Houses'
in the NYT by ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
The concept of the passive house, pioneered in this city of 140,000 outside Frankfurt, approaches the challenge from a different angle. Using ultrathick insulation and complex doors and windows, the architect engineers a home encased in an airtight shell, so that barely any heat escapes and barely any cold seeps in. That means a passive house can be warmed not only by the sun, but also by the heat from appliances and even from occupants' bodies.
And in Germany, passive houses cost only about 5 to 7 percent more to build than conventional houses.
... The European Commission is promoting passive-house building, and the European Parliament has proposed that new buildings meet passive-house standards by 2011.
... The courses and literature were mostly in German, and even now the components are mass-produced only in this part of the world.
No Furnaces but Heat Aplenty in 'Passive Houses"
Passive House Institute

Is there an impact on the technological approach of countries that have green parties in power for prolonged periods of time? This article covers an anecdote that seems to indicate just that.
Germany had a green party in power for some years and because of the popularity of its ideas all other parties have been integrating the same ideas in their own platforms. This also explains how innovation and entrepreneurialism thrived along the same lines.
Result: Germany today is the uncontested world leader in:
- passive building technologies
- solar and wind technologies
- the manufacturing and application of those technologies in real life.
What more needs to be said?
Imagine the application of such passive technologies generalized in a country as the US. The result would be a drastic reduction of its national energy consumption, a drastic reduction of its energy imports that eventually would result in its balance of payment entering positive territory, If the country had mastered the technology before others it would also have an export opportunity that would result in pushing its balance of payment further into positive territory. And lastly a reduction on the scale that passive technologies could allow would also drastically reduce the emission of CO2 and other gases responsible for the present man induced climate change.
We can only observe that such a scenario did not originate in the US but in the countries composing the Germanic area of the EU. So it seems to me that some conclusions...