close
jbet777

Last seen: 8 hours ago

Ed is a 55 year old guy from Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

free counters

  • Did U.S. negotiators go against the Bush administration...

    Rated Dec 18 2007 1 review politics, global warming mongabay.com

    Did U.S. negotiators go against the Bush administration in Bali?
    mongabay.com
    December 18, 2007

    From the page: "Insiders in Washington are speculating that the US delegation to the U.N. climate talks in Bali went against the wishes of the Bush Administration as negotiations drew to a close last weekend, according to SPIEGEL ONLINE.

    After taking a hard line stance during the first 10 days of the conference, U.S. delegates agreed Saturday to a weak road map for further negotiations of a new climate change pact. The negotiators had been widely criticized over the course of the meeting for the American stance on binding emissions limits. Now it is unclear whether the Bush Administration approved the decision, reports SPIEGEL ONLINE.

    "All other steps had been cleared by the White House," a high-ranking official familiar with Washington's strategy in Bali told SPIEGEL ONLINE. "But the final stretch of the conference has been very emotional. [There was] much psychological pressure. The US delegates were booed, close allies like Canada and Saudi Arabia turned against them. It's quite possible that the leader of the US delegation, Paula Dobriansky, decided about the final concession on the spot."

    The developments could explain why White House press secretary Dana Perino on Sunday expressed dissatisfaction with the Bali compromise, stating "The United States does have serious concerns about other aspects of the Decision".

    The Bush Administration had been pushing its own climate meeting next month in Hawaii as an alternative to the U.N. process. Critics say the Hawaii conference is unlikely to set meaningful targets on emissions."




    Did U.S. negotiators go against the Bush administration in Bali?
  • It’s Too Late for Later - New York Times

    Rated Dec 18 2007 1 review environment, biodiversity nytimes.com

    It's Too Late for Later
    By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
    The New York Times
    Published: December 16, 2007

    From the page: "Throughout human history there was always some new part of the ocean to plunder, some new forest to devour, some new farmlands to exploit, noted Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, who came to observe the Bali conference. But "now that economic development has become the prerogative of every country," he said, we've run out of virgin oceans and lands "for new rising economic powers to exploit." So, too many countries are now chasing too few fish, trees and water resources, and are either devouring their own or plundering those of neighbors at alarming rates.

    Indeed, today's global economy has become like a monster truck with the gas pedal stuck, and we've lost the key -- so no one can stop it from wiping out more and more of the natural world, no matter what the global plan. There was a chilling essay in The Jakarta Post last week by Andrio Adiwibowo, a lecturer in environmental management at the University of Indonesia. It was about how a smart plan to protect the mangrove forests around coastal Jakarta was never carried out, leading to widespread tidal flooding last month.

    This line jumped out at me: "The plan was not implemented. Instead of providing a buffer zone, development encroached into the core zone, which was covered over by concrete."

    You could read that story in a hundred different developing countries today. But the fact that you read it here is one of the most important reasons that later has become extinct. Indonesia is second only to Brazil in terrestrial biodiversity and is No. 1 in the world in marine biodiversity. Just one and a half acres in Borneo contains more different tree species than all of North America -- not to mention animals that don't exist anywhere else on earth. If we lose them, there will be no later for some of the rarest plants and animals on the planet."



    It’s Too Late for Later - New York Times
  • Energy 3566 on Flickr - Photo Sharing!
  • t r u t h o u t | Bill Moyers Talks With MSNBC Host Keith...

    Rated Dec 17 2007 1 review politics, video truthout.org

    Bill Moyers Talks With MSNBC Host Keith Olbermann
    Bill Moyers Journal
    Friday 14 December 2007



    t r u t h o u t | Bill Moyers Talks With MSNBC Host Keith Olbermann
  • Climate - Global Warming - Carbon Dioxide - China -...

    Rated Dec 17 2007 1 review politics, global warming nytimes.com

    As China Goes, So Goes Global Warming
    By ANDREW C. REVKIN
    Published: December 16, 2007

    From the page: "Richard Richels, an economist at the Electric Power Research Institute, helped produce an ominous forecast: even if the established industrial powers turned off every power plant and car right now, unless there are changes in policy in poorer countries the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could still reach 450 parts per million -- a level deemed unacceptably dangerous by many scientists -- by 2070. (If no one does anything, that threshold is reached in 2040.)"



    Climate - Global Warming - Carbon Dioxide - China - Developing Countries - New York Times
  • Lunch Time Grinds

    Rated Dec 17 2007 0 reviews blog, food, hawaii blogspot.com

    Lunch Time Grinds
  • Cheap Places to Eat in Oahu Hawaii
  • Winged Seeds 4163 on Flickr - Photo Sharing!
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Image-Ad%C3%A9lie_at_iceberg.jpg.jpg