THE REVOLUTIONARY PLEASURE OF THINKING FOR YOURSELF
Reviewed • 146 reviews • deoxy.org
based entirely on the old-fashioned concept of the self as a unified, singular object with clear distinctions between "self" and "not-self." the people who wrote this had good intentions, but the hidden implication that there is a single definition of self is, to me, more constricting than it is liberating. although the article probably comes off as rebellious and forward-thinking, in the scope of philosophy over the last century, these ideas are actually rather outdated and conservative. one need only browse a textbook on post-strucuralism to see the inherent logical fallacies in this article's stance.