Scientists offered cash to dispute climate study |...
Rated • 11 reviews • news • guardian.co.uk
Several questions: Is this $10,000 in grant money or pocket change? How much money is given to the scientists on the other side of the aisle (in grant money, plane trips, yada, yada...)
I really wish the media was unbiased, right or left, and just reported the news, instead they try to advance their own parties political agenda, or religion (in this case)
Global warming is a hot topic right now, and scientists keep their jobs and get big grants if they can prove that people are causing a warming trend. How many of these same scientists predicted the hole in the ozone would kill everyone, and further back, that another ice age was imminent? How many are just following the cash flow?
This science is not really science at all. Science should be impartial and try to draw conclusions regardless of whether it extends their grant for another few years. Most of these proven warming trends are from computer models, programed with the hypothesis always in mind and quantified, while neglecting anything capable of equalizing the trend that may or may not be caused by humans (I've yet to see evidence one way or the other that humans are causing warming). The scientists in France talk about a report that proves it, once I read the report, and discount the junk, I may be impartial enough to form an opinion.
