Rated
Jul 23 2009
•
2 reviews
•
history
• blogspot.com
From the page: "Alinsky's Rules for Radicals and how they can work for us.
This is a preliminary draft. The article may be further elaborated upon with new and pertinent additions.
These are the "Rules for Radicals" developed by Saul Alinsky with the purpose of establishing strategies to fight against the democratically elected governments and the free market corporations. These rules are very effective. But, ironically, the same rules can be used today by conservative patriots to fight against a socialist/communist government that is creeping into America. See how you can identify and use these rules for our cause:
RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have."
The Tea Parties have given a hint to the government of who we are, and what we stand for. But we know we have something that they don't, we have something that they don't think or believe we have, and that is: resolve. We cannot afford to lose this battle because if we do, two or more generations after us will suffer dire consequences. We have no excuse to be idle and do nothing or do not enough. Can you imagine your children and your children's children staring at you and pointing a finger at you saying "you could have done something about it and you didn't". Do we have what it takes to fight for us, for our children, for our country, for our Constitution? We must show and display that we are fighting a battle we cannot afford to lose. Or everything is lost. Here lies our strength and our motivation.
Does the government know the power we have? I am not sure it does, otherwise, it would either listen to what w have to say or take drastic measures to counterbalance our numbers and powers.
On the other hand, do we know what power the government has? We have seen so far mainly executive and legislative power. But is it this all the government rely upon to balance our position or they have powers that we are still unaware of? Where do the military, law enforcement and intelligence agencies stand. These and other questions must be answered if we are to have a real and convincing idea who and what we stand against."