MESSAGE TO SMOKERS
07/01/2007 - Joe Jackson
Dear Smokers,
You are the scum of the earth. Bad enough that you are intent on committing suicide, but with your noxious fumes you are committing nothing less than murder too.
The preceding statement should sound pretty familiar by now. If you believe it, don't bother to read any further. But if you're skeptical, consider this: you're being made into scapegoats by people who are nowhere near as honest and noble as is commonly assumed. In fact a lot of them are downright nasty, and it's about time you started standing up to them.
From July 1st, smoking is banned in every pub, restaurant and club in England - including private clubs, but then again a pub is private property too. I could bemoan the loss of property rights; I could also have a good rant about the loss of tolerance and free choice. But the real issue is that the only possible justification for this ban is blatantly, and provably, so phoney that it stinks to high heaven. I refer, of course, to the grotesquely-hyped but elusive phantom of 'secondhand smoke'.
Some people seem to think smoking is being banned just because they don't LIKE it, or because it has in some circles become unfashionable. But these are no concerns of the government, and they can easily be addressed by good ventilation systems and/or separate spaces, according to market demand.
If, on the other hand, tobacco smoke in the air - even on well-ventilated premises, even in separate rooms, even, if the antismoking brigade has its way, OUTSIDE - is putting innocent bystanders in mortal danger, then I'd say tobacco should be completely illegal, since it would clearly be worse than heroin. But first, I'd want to see at least one proven case of death caused by ETS (Environmental Tobacco Smoke). Because I, and many other people - scientists, academics, activists, and just plain skeptics - have been researching this issue for many years, and we haven't come across one yet.
Take a look at
davehitt.com [davehitt.com] . Mr Hitt's article 'Name Three' is a grimly hilarious account of how he went to just about every antismoking authority in the USA in a fruitless quest to find three real-life cases. I've been in debates myself in which I've asked antismokers to name one, and been repeatedly ignored. Once I was told this information could not be revealed because of 'professional etiquette'.
Just last month, I had an article about smoking bans published in a German magazine. The editor removed the line 'there is not one proven documented case of death caused by secondhand smoke', claiming that there was one such case in Italy. I investigated. The case in question was the death of Monica Crema, whose husband succesfully sued her employer, Pariba Bank, claiming that she had been killed by smoke at work. SECONDHAND SMOKE KILLS! said the headlines. But the verdict was appealed. This time there was a proper trial, and it was found that Ms Crema had actually died from a food allergy. And the headlines said . . . well, nothing, actually.
I could say that even a few cases would still be pretty insignificant compared to all the deaths irrefutably caused by booze, or cars, or even prescription drugs. But the fact is that the antismokers' case for ETS collapses when subjected to the slightest scrutiny. Unable to produce actual proof, they tell us that ETS kills because they say so, and we wouldn't understand, so we must take their word for it. And at this point I need to 'zoom out,' so to speak, and briefly address the bigger picture.
There's an old saying: 'trust me, I'm a doctor'. But I'm asking you to trust me because I'm NOT. Many people these days, including newspaper editors and politicians, are simply not willing to challenge or question medical authorities...