Rated
Sep 30
•
64 reviews
•
stumbleupon
• searchenginejournal.com
Excellent article highlighting the changes in the new BETA format of SU. There are some pros and cons of these changes, of course (as there always will be).
CON: Current users often find the "retro" version bland and sterile.
PRO: However, from what I understand in the founder's message on the subject, he simply stated it does not contain themes yet ~ not that there would not be any in the future. This is just a very basic prototype being tweaked and tested right now. Also, even this basic white version can be customized with HTML/CSS within individual posts just as easily as in the current regular version.
PRO: Currently, a good portion of new users are turned off by SU's complexity (trust me, I've had many inquiries from newbies asking how to do this and that, blah, blah, because they just couldn't absorb it all).
PRO (for me, at least!): Removal of the friends feature. GOOD RIDDANCE! It is such a source of contention and fraught with bruised egos, drama-fests and all sorts of soap-opera ugliness that simply does not belong on a forum of this size and nature. If you want friends, use Facebook. I want to blog and share my finds and thoughts with people of similar interests. Those I want to truly "bond" with I can do so at other sites. There is just too much other stuff going on at SU for that, and I like to take time to get to know "friends," which is very hard to do here at SU. When I am able, I do try to visit my subscribers, so at least having that function enables me to see who they are and maybe get to know some of them better (although lately all I've had time for is post-and-run, sorry!). :-P~
PRO: Even without the friends feature, we can still subscribe to people in the BETA version, and there IS an option to allow individual subscribers to send you site shares (same as the with the mutual friend option in the regular format).
PRO (for me)/CON (for those who use SU as simply a surfing tool vs a blogging forum): While I'm lazy and, like many others, have resorted to using the "What's New" page more than visiting people's blogs (who doesn't?), I like the concept of having to actually visit stumblers' blogs again and getting an idea of who they are and what they're about, instead of seeing a sea of nameless faces scrolling down a page of links. But that's just me.
Before the "What's New" feature was introduced, I had between 100-400 visitors per day. Now, depending on whether or not I've been active here and how long I stick around on a particular day, I get between maybe 5-50. That means approximately 90% of my traffic was wiped out by the "What's New" feature. Even so, any recommended links themselves get a fair amount of traffic as they are visited directly from the "What's New" page after I post my review. So I post a review of a site, people bypass my own site and repost the review and/or go directly to the site I reviewed. Kinda feels like I'm some kind of left-out middleman who has no idea who is going where (except via feedback from some people whose sites I reviewed thanking me for the influx of traffic) ~ but they certainly aren't coming here!
CONS, CONS and more CONS: There are a large number of bugs, kinks, inefficiencies and frustrating things about the new BETA version (see post below).
But these are my personal opinions and observations. I believe in amicably "agreeing to disagree" on this subject. As for the future, who knows what that holds? We'll see. ;-)