Rated
Nov 23 2008
•
1 review
•
business, politics, the meltdown
• nytimes.com
Senior management sang itself to sleep with happy-faced sophistry and now we discover why the Deregulation Panacea, The New World Order, Globalization, Free Trade, and so on, might be in the wrong hands to ever succeed together.
The extent conflicts of interest reigned now seem glaring and obvious but to the participants it was business as usual? More of this we don't need - but doubtless more is on the way.
From the page:
"Normally, a big bank would never allow the word of just one executive to carry so much weight. Instead, it would have its risk managers aggressively look over any shoulder and guard against trading or lending excesses.
But many Citigroup insiders say the bank's risk managers never investigated deeply enough. Because of longstanding ties that clouded their judgment, the very people charged with overseeing deal makers eager to increase short-term earnings -- and executives' multimillion-dollar bonuses -- failed to rein them in, these insiders say.
Today, Citigroup, once the nation's largest and mightiest financial institution, has been brought to its knees by more than $65 billion in losses, write-downs for troubled assets and charges to account for future losses. More than half of that amount stems from mortgage-related securities created by Mr. Maheras's team -- the same products Mr. Prince was briefed on during that 2007 meeting.
Citigroup's stock has plummeted to its lowest price in more than a decade, closing Friday at $3.77. At that price the company is worth just $20.5 billion, down from $244 billion two years ago. Waves of layoffs have accompanied that slide, with about 75,000 jobs already gone or set to disappear from a work force that numbered about 375,000 a year ago."