Created •
From Wikipedia: "According to present observations of structures larger than galaxies, as well as Big Bang cosmology, dark matter and dark energy could account for the vast majority of the mass in the observable universe
I am just a naive artist but there seems to be a certain spooky premise here based on cognitions rather than observations that obscures the problem since dark matter is unobservable by emitted observation. In fact dark matter can only be known by its effect.
My quesition is why don't theses materialist scientist say since the majority of the universe seems to be dark matter, that dark matter exists in the Universe, rather than the universe exist in dark matter which is No-thing which makes sense since the universe appears to have banged out of No-thing? Why do they not at least entertain the idea that No-thing and and the Universe of matter are two sides of the same coin like Nirvana and Samsara and are not polerized into some kind of dualism ....
Now the only No-thing that I have ever observed by its effects is mind and I think that dark matter can be thought of Big Mind or Consiousness in which matter or the Universe exists. The implication being that the only thing that I know of that exist in mind which is no-thing are thoughts and Laws--Laws of Mind of mind then...and if that is true matter would appear to be Virtual Thoughts and Laws of big Mind. However, within the Universe of Virtual Thoughts and Laws the consciousness that evolved within
Mind and reflects and observes itself cannot observe its ground which is no-thing and therefore cannot detect it is virtual!
No I am not stoned...One thing I can assure you is that these thoughts will definitely have effects either negative or positive...This is a materialist nightmare--which will be dismissed as metaphysical poppycock by dogmatic materialist--for it implies finite is embeded in infinite No-Thing and unenbedded in the finite elements and organization of matter in the existential Universe.
This is just one of my simple or maybe simplistic ideas but it definitely show a systematic bias to say that the large majority of "something--dark matter" exist the observable minority of things...bye the way since energy is matter and vice verse we are talking about energy and dark energy too...







