RR16

From the page: "TheGovernment's Emissions Trading Scheme is a new multibillion dollar national tax that will hit every Australian family and every Australian business with no environmental benefit.

Put simply, industry will pay the Government for the right to emit carbon dioxide: an odourless, colourless gas that is essential for life on earth. These additional costs will then be passed on to consumers with expected large rises in the price of everything we use or consume. Some experts predict large-scale industry closures and massive job losses as factories relocate overseas."

From the page: "Monday, November 23, 2009
Glenn Beck on "ClimateGate" (video)
Glenn Beck analyzes the collusion and conspiracy exposed in the hacked emails from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University. Beck rocks!"

From the page: "The devastating book which debunks climate change

By Christopher Booker"

From the page: "Why Would Obama Take Such a Risk with KSM?
by Leon de Winter

I was involved with a similar fiasco with Ayaan Hirsi Ali in Holland. Why would Obama risk a constitutional crisis?

Some years ago, when the legal position of Dutch MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali was a matter of national discussion in Holland (she had lied about her refugee status when she entered Holland fleeing an arranged marriage, a fact she had talked about many times in interviews), Minister of Immigration and Integration Rita Verdonk, herself a member of Ayaan�s political party, insisted on pushing this issue to the very edge. Vehemently, Ms. Verdonk stuck to the facts, and formally she was right."

From the page: "Rep. Keith Ellison, the Islamists' Man on Capitol Hill
As a U.S. representative, Keith Ellison's primary responsibility is to represent his constituents in Minnesota's 5th congressional district.

The first Muslim elected to Congress, Ellison, a Democrat, also seems to feel an obligation to be the voice of Muslim Americans in Washington. "

From the page: "No Comments Comment on this article

Climategate: still an astonishing lack of coverage in the MSM, the only major UK exception being the Mail which, after years of agnosticism now seems to have decided to come down firmly in the climate sceptics� camp �" here, here and in this article today by the mighty Booker. (Nigel Lawson is able to slip in a mention, too, in today�s Times).

But is that because �" as some of the commenters below my post are so eager to tell me �" it�s a complete non-story which deserves to get me the sack for being such a rubbish journalist (with innumerable websites dedicated to telling the world just how crap I am, apparently)?

Or does it have legs? (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

This interview with retired climatalogist Dr Tim Ball offers quite a useful perspective."

From the page: "For those of us
�oeskeptics” and �oedeniers” who have been jumping
up and down, pointing at the Sun, and saying, �oeSee, it�s
the Sun that determines how warm or cool the Earth is. See it? Up there
in the sky?” The truth about some of the scientists behind the
global warming hoax has finally arrived."

From the page: "While few U.S. politicians bother to question whether humans are changing the world's climate -- nearly three years ago the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded the evidence was unequivocal -- public debate persists. And the newly disclosed private exchanges among climate scientists at Britain's Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia reveal an intellectual circle that appears to feel very much under attack, and eager to punish its enemies. "