From the page: "The primary role of math teachers, constructivists say in turn, shouldn't be to explain or otherwise try to transfer their mathematical knowledge to students; that would be ineffective. Instead, they must help the students construct their own understanding of mathematics and find their own math solutions."
I agree, and here's a supporting anecdote:
Throughout most of my primary and secondary education, I hated math. That changed in a high school geometry class when I was the only student to solve an advanced problem on parallelograms, one that had stumped even our teacher. The answer (a general solution) came to me intuitively, and my teacher challenged me to prove it. At that time, proofs were cerebral torture devices, but I eventually came up with three of them for this identity, and I was amazed. I began to see the straightforward way that proofs followed from definitions and postulates. That dawn of clarity transformed mathematics from a confusing collection of arcane rules and procedures into almost a game, a way of discovery by valid restatement. For the first time in my life, I enjoyed math.
I began reading ahead in my textbook, and a brilliant Slovak friend recommended
The Book of Numbers by Conway and Guy, which became my Bible. By the time I was 18, I had independently generalized the binomial theorem to what I later learned is called the
multinomial theorem, and had even generalized the
combination (or "choose") function to generate its coefficients, discovered that these coefficients take the shape of higher-dimensional
simplices (tetrahedron, pentatope, etc.), and come up with a general way to produce the
n-bonacci sequence from the coefficients of the nth instance of the multinomial theorem. I didn't realize at the time that most of this had already been done by others, and I never attempted to publish the few genuine discoveries of my own. It was all for my personal enjoyment and enlightenment.
Later, my interests broadened to include linguistics, history, archaeology, anthropology, religious studies, and (as I grew familiar with the theoretical debates and competing methodologies within and between these fields) philosophy. These were subjects I probably never would have pursued if that high school math teacher had not set me on a course of autodidactic curiosity and confidence.
Therefore, I strongly believe that the best way to teach a subject is to encourage students to develop their own understandings of it and to make their own discoveries within it. However, I recognize that my motivation was also fueled by that intuitive discovery about parallelograms, which prompted my teacher to push me harder. Not all students will have that kind of experience, so perhaps constructivism isn't the most productive method for everyone all the time. Still, instructors should use that technique if and when a student shows signs of readiness.
As Plutarch said, "The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled."