911review/terror

From the page: "Less Than 0.01% Of Homeland Security Cases Are Terrorism Related
So why does the government say terrorism is DHS primary focus?

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Monday, May 28, 2007


Records obtained from the immigration courts under the Freedom of Information Act show that only 0.0015 percent of the total number of cases filed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security were terrorism related, despite the fact that the Bush administration has repeatedly asserted that it is the primary focus of the DHS.

A report issued Sunday by independent research group The Transactional Records Action Clearinghouse (TRAC) found that in the last three years there have only been 12 charges of terrorism out of 814,073 cases.

This once again highlights that the terrorist threat to America is vastly over hyped and is being used by a criminally controlled government as an excuse to police the world and foment a domestic police state to crush any dissent amongst the American people.

"The DHS claims it is focused on terrorism. Well that's just not true," David Burnham, a TRAC spokesman told CNN. "Either there's no terrorism, or they're terrible at catching them. Either way it's bad for all of us."

DHS spokesman Russ Knocke called the TRAC report "ill-conceived" and said the group "lacked a grasp of the DHS mission."

Knocke said that, by clamping down on all forms of immigration, DHS has made it difficult for terrorists to come to the United States.

Knocke's comments are clearly absurd as there are still millions of illegal immigrants pouring into the country every year and the borders remain wide open, the very reason why there is currently a heated debate over total immigration reform.

Even more revealing was the fact that the TRAC analysis also found that out of those 800,000 or so individuals charged only 114, or 0.014 percent of the total were charged with national security violations.

This re-emphasizes the fact that the Department of Homeland Security is nothing more than a bloated bureaucratic federal Octopus protruding its lawless tentacles into local government and policing. It has nothing to do with protecting America and everything to do with scaring it into total subjugation.

Earlier this month President Bush signed legislation which declares that in the event of a "catastrophic event", the President can take total control over the government and the country, bypassing all other levels of government, including Congress, and thus ensuring total unprecedented dictatorial power. A key part of this legislation places the Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of domestic "security".

When he announced the creation of a new Department of Homeland Security in 2002, President Bush invoked the fight against "terror" or "terrorists" 19 times in a single speech. Thus the word was used seven more times in one speech than there have been actual terrorism charges brought by the department in the last three years.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let us help you reach a huge audience of potential customers.
Help support the website and take advantage of low advertising rates. Click here for more info.
Find out the true story behind government sponsored terror, 7/7, Gladio and 9/11, get Terror Storm!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Should we be surprised that the DHS has nothing to do with terrorism? Quite frankly no, as we have tirelessly exposed the DHS track record of purely targeting innocent US citizens.

Since 9/11 the PATRIOT Act has been used in numerous cases involving American citizens, including strip club owners, toy store proprietors, the homeless, owners of websites, writers, internet users, artists, journalists and photographers.

Maybe in order to find more terrorists the DHS should investigate itself. In 2004 the DHS employed former East German Stasi head, the 'Silver Fox' Markus Wolfe who had previously been denied entry to the US as he was considered a terrorist. In addition, the DHS also hired Ex-head of the Soviet KGB, General Yevgeni Primakov.

What was it about their CVs that attracted the DHS?

Welcome to the new America. "

Former Polish prime minister denies country had secret CIA prisons, speaking with Blair
Deutsche Presse Agentur
Published: Thursday March 8, 2007
Print This Email This

Warsaw - Poland's former prime minister Leszek Miller on Thursday denied a fresh report alleging EU and NATO member Poland had hosted secret jails for terror suspects operated by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

'Once again I refute that there were secret prisons in Poland,' Miller said Thursday, quoted by the Polish PAP news agency. 'Tony Blair never spoke with me about this because there was nothing to talk about,' he said.

Raw Story, a US-based internet news source quoted a confidential MI-6 British intelligence document which is alleged to have said British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Miller discussed plans for a short term CIA prison for terror suspect created in a top-security Polish intelligence compound in Stary Kiejkuty, northern Poland.

Blair is to have asked that Miller not inform cabinet ministers about the facility.

The Raw Story report also alleges US plans for transporting terror suspects to Poland were drawn up in 2002 in meeting between Polish intelligence officials, then CIA head George Tenet and MI-6 chief John Scarlett.

Zbigniew Siemiatkowski, Polish intelligence chief in 2002, on Thursday denied any such meetings took place.

He also suggested the information presented by Raw Story could be part of the domestic political battle in the US over who is to succeed current Republican President George W Bush.

International media reports alleging the CIA had opened secret interim prisons for terror suspects from Afghanistan in Poland and Romania first surfaced in late 2005.

A probe into the matter by the European Parliament found no concrete evidence to either confirm or deny such prisons had existed in Poland.

Orignal Able Danger DOC's...
"House of Representatives, Washington, DC, November 9, 2005. Hon. Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, The Pentagon, Washington, DC. Dear Secretary Rumsfeld: We the undersigned are formally requesting that you allow former participants in the intelligence program known as Able Danger to testify in an open hearing before the United States Congress. Until this point, congressional efforts to investigate Able Danger have been obstructed by Department of Defense insistence that certain individuals with knowledge of Able Danger be prevented from freely and frankly testifying in an open hearing. We realize that you do not question Congress's authority to maintain effective oversight of executive branch agencies, including your department. It is our understanding that your objection instead derives from concern that classified information could be improperly exposed in an open hearing. We of course would never support any activity that might compromise sensitive information involving national security. However, we firmly believe that testimony from the appropriate individuals in an open hearing on Able Danger would not only fail to jeopardize national security, but would in fact enhance it over the long term. "

No 10 sidesteps inquiry after WMD claim

By Graeme Wilson, Political Correspondent
Last Updated: 1:41am GMT 16/12/2006

Downing Street brushed aside calls from Sir John Major for a full inquiry into the Iraq war after a former British diplomat revealed that the Government had not believed that Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) posed a threat to the UK.

Sir John Major called for an independent inquiry

Sir John backed an investigation after the publication of evidence submitted to the Butler inquiry into Iraq by Carne Ross, Britain's former First Secretary at the United Nations.

Mr Ross's damning three-page testimony raises fresh questions about Tony Blair's justification for the war and states that there had been "no intelligence evidence" that Saddam had chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. He added that British officials had repeatedly warned the US that the dictator's overthrow would trigger "chaos".

Electronic control is slave trade
por Henk Ruyssenaars - Foreign correspondent Friday, Nov. 10, 2006 at 11:23 AM
fpf@chello.nl (Casilla de correo válida)

Controlling people via an 'Automatic Number Plate Recognition' system, is based on information they 'voluntarily' have been forced to give earlier. Decency, privacy and respect seem to have gone with the wind howling around the globe in the name of the US junta's fake 'security' for their terror.

ID? THE TRAFFIC COPS KNEW EVERYTHING

i researched this story just after it happened.
the WAY in which the LIES came out, was truly disturbing !
There is SOMETHING much deeper here,
i don tknow what it is, but maybe this guy had info on what really happened on 7/7 (london bombing)
Brad
911review.org
-------------------------------------------------------

"Sir Ian to be 'criticised', not disciplined, over Stockwell
New inquiry finds no evidence that the Met Commissioner misled the public after last year's police shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes
By Sophie Goodchild, Chief Reporter
Published: 17 December 2006

Sir Ian Blair, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, is understood to be among those officers singled out for criticism in an official report into the handling of the aftermath of the Stockwell shooting.

The Met chief is on a list drawn up by law-yers of people who will receive a formal letter from the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), warning them of the findings. Sources close to the inquiry said: "Clearly there was a cock-up and the buck stops with him."

The investigators have spent more than a year examining an allegation by the family of Jean Charles de Menezes that Sir Ian misled the public over the shooting of the Brazilian electrician at Stockwell Tube station last year."

Terrorism 101
Dale Watson, now retired, was the FBI's top counterterrorism official before and after 9/11.

In a deposition taken on Dec. 8, 2004, Youssef's lawyer Stephen Kohn asked Watson: "Do you know who Osama bin Laden's spiritual leader was?"

Watson: Can't recall.

Lawyer: And do you know the differences in the religion between Shiite and Sunni Muslims?

Watson: Not technically, no.

John Lewis was until recently the FBI's deputy assistant director of counterterrorism. During his deposition on May 17, 2005, he was asked if he knew the difference between Shiites and Sunnis.

Lewis: You know, generally. Not very well.

Lawyer: Was there any relationship between the first World Trade Center bombing and the 9/11 attacks?

Lewis: I'm aware of no immediate relationship other than all emanates out of the Middle East, al-Qaida linkage, I believe. Not something I've studied recently that I'm conversant with.

and HOW MUCH are we speding on this SHI** ??
your TAX $ hard at work folks !!!
ALSO SEE...

Fake Terror

From the page: "WASHINGTON (AP) - Without notifying the public, federal agents for the past four years have assigned millions of international travelers, including Americans, computer-generated scores rating the risk they pose of being terrorists or criminals.

The travelers are not allowed to see or directly challenge these risk assessments, which the government intends to keep on file for 40 years.

The scores are assigned to people entering and leaving the United States after computers assess their travel records, including where they are from, how they paid for tickets, their motor vehicle records, past one-way travel, seating preference and what kind of meal they ordered.

The program's existence was quietly disclosed earlier in November when the government put an announcement detailing the Automated Targeting System, or ATS, for the first time in the Federal Register, a fine-print compendium of federal rules. Privacy and civil liberties lawyers, congressional aides and even law enforcement officers said they thought this system had been applied only to cargo."

The government notice says ATS data may be shared with state, local and foreign governments for use in hiring decisions and in granting licenses, security clearances, contracts or other benefits. In some cases, the data may be shared with courts, Congress and even private contractors.