911review/conspiracy

What is the most outrageous piece of news that isn't being discussed? I would venture to say it is the strange tale of Dov Zakheim and the missing trillions. I hear all kinds of numbers. I hear 2.3 trillion from Rumsfield and I hear about one trillion that Zakheim can't explain. Still, you'll need to check the dates of Zakheim's days in the saddle as Pentagon Comptroller and then you can wonder to your hearts content. There's no doubt the money is gone and there's no doubt about who should know where it went but...what do I know? I know one trillion dollars is a lot of money. Isn't one trillion dollars a million million? Zounds!!!

Has the cost of the entire Iraqi incursion come to a trillion dollars yet? It certainly isn't anywhere near 2.3 trillion. Why isn't this under discussion? Is it just too big a thing, too enormous to comprehend, that our minds go blank when we think about it? Hmmm...

There are a number of researched sources for all of the details you need to get a grasp of the situation. I'm not going to go into that kind of detail here. It's been done better than I can manage at places like here onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1015.shtml [onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1015.shtml] and here solari.com/learn/articles_missingmoney.htm [solari.com/learn/articles_missingmoney.htm] this last link gives you many further links. You might want to read some of this before you continue here. And you should probably read this onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1047.shtml [onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1047.shtml] by the author of the first link.

author of this page, admittedly works for MSRI.

MSRI's top customer is the NSA.



911review.com was a direct attack on my site
(originally created by Mike Elliot)




911review.org [911review.org]





911review.org is the original, and was created BEFORE 911review.com

911review.com copied the format of the whole site

This has led to confusion as well.



911review.com does nothing to educate the reader on issues, but only attacks 911review.org.


The author also at first said that no plane hit the pentagon, gaining himself support in the 911 truth movement, then, did an about face, and now supports the "official" version.



The Author (Jim Hoffman) also says that the term "PULL IT" is NOT an industry term.



Silverstein (owner of the WTC) who made the remark that building 7 was "pulled", said
"there was such a terrible loss of life, we decided to "PULL-IT", and we watched the building come down.


To me, there is no denying wht was meant, but that is EXACTLY what Hoffman does, deny that Silverstein was involved.



This takes away probably the BEST evidence the 9-11 truth movement has to date in one statement.




Many other researchers have thought Hoffman to be an agent as well...



One has to wonder what this persons goal actually is ?



Further, one of Hoffmans first pieces of "research" , suggested that a large RF (radio frequency) beam was in the basement of the twin towers and caused its collapse.

Jim Hoffman is a software engineer and knows nothing about structural engineering, OR RF energy.

(I am a Sr. RF design engineer), and this scenario is laughable !

This was obviously a mis-direction technique used to confuse other researchers.



read more about hoffman including his obvious misrepresentation of the Anthrax attacks here
and
here



911review.org/Wiki [911review.org/Wiki] /911Review.Com.shtml


awstats

awstats

my pentagon analysis

I am a cell phone engineer
THis is BULL
i have 2 FCC licenses and worked in RF
(radio Freq) for MANY years

i left a comment as 911review

if your phone is OFF theres no power to turn on the mic
and no power to transmit.

Anyone believing in FAUX NOISE (FOX)
has bigger problems than being worried about the Gov listening to your calls

911 Anomalies ... and Counting There are hundreds of anomalies related to the September 11th attacks. Use this blog as a resource to explore their meaning and hopefully, bring those responsible to Justice.

The more i think about this the more mad i get.
Bush sat for somewhere between 7 and 20 minutes reading with kids while America was under attack.
What i now realize is that Bush is an IDIOT.
(well thats already known)
But he NEEDS to be told what to do.
Cheney and the Neo-Cons knew this and knew he wouldnt do anything until he was told to.
He hadnt been president long and he was used to his aids and the Secret Service telling him when to leave where to go etc...
Cheney needed time for his part in the war-games. and Bush sitting there was perfect.
Thats why his aids never whisked him off after the second plane hit.
Micheal Moore hinted on this a bit in Fahrenheit 9/11


1

2

Bush Administration Insider Says U.S. Government Behind 9/11 911review.org/Media/Reynolds_9_11_truth_Video.html [911review.org/Media/Reynolds_9_11_truth_Video.html]
Dr. Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, is professor emeritus at Texas A&M University and
former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for
Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX. He served as chief economist
for the United States Department of Labor during 2001--2002, George W. Bush's
first term. In 2005, he gained public attention as the first prominent
government official to publicly claim that 9/11 was an "inside job,"
and is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. This interview footage was recorded in
June 2006 at the Chicago 9/11 Truth conference.

Pentagon Attack? 911review.org/Wiki/PentagonAttack.shtml [911review.org/Wiki/PentagonAttack.shtml]
They say an airliner crashed into the Pentagon,
but if so, why isn't there the debris of an airliner
in the photos of the scene of the Pentagon Attack?

debris left at the pentagon on 9-11 NOT from a jetliner
most of this shows it was proof to be salted evidence