|  namzezam | Jul 12, 4:11pm | please see this page given as an entry point
comcom.wikidot.com [comcom.wikidot.com]
i hope this is the place to triger the question:
Is ComComism the new 3rd way between the old Capitalism and Communism, Socialism or any system of representatives for citizens? |
|
| 
Sponsor |  Yoza | Jul 14, 2:17pm | | As far as I can tell there is the expectation that 5,500 strangers are going to pay to be in this com com organisation. Realistically, this is not going to happen, in the space of 5 years there is unlikely to be that many visitors to the site, let alone enough of those who are willing to hand over cash to what is a confusing manifesto. |
|
|
| | namzezam | Jul 19, 10:21am | Yoza, thanks for your input, in its way it adds:)
And now, let each of us, for better clarification, follow the arguments of another. So here i begin, i did not gut this:
Are confused from this manifesto and if so, could you tell by what? |
|
|
Sponsor | | Yoza | Jul 19, 10:57pm | IsWith ComCom GovComCom: ComComism is the new 3rd way beyond the old Capitalism and Communism, Socialism or any system of representatives for citizens!
"ComComize now, Because only a comcomized unit (Common Company aka ComCom) lets you go out of itself (to exit) with a positive value of your property, even if and although it was shared equally with others.
Being able to exit with a positive value even when the ownership is shared equally is significant because the few control the most mainly by offering representatives acting in your interest in collectives in which you may have "equal say", but for which the entry is only under the prior condition of none could ever exit with a positive value of any property being shared in that collective (i.e. if you exit, then only with zero or undetermined value)!
Only where both conditions are met, namely to share the property equally between the many and to let each of the many be able to exit with a positive value, such representatives, when acting in the name of the most, will be motivated to act in their interest, since otherwise each of them will take their share and go while "leaving the king without a kingdom".
This is confusing, and this is your/ComComism's opening statement. Politcal philosophies outside the mainstream really struggle to compete for the attention of potential recruits, as a means of inspiring anyone to 'convert' to comcomism this page is a disaster.
Consider the sort of whacky crap the Libertarians would have you believe, its delusional fantasy but it is polished and relatively sophisticated in its delivery. |
|
|
| |
| 
|  dressing | Jul 21, 9:50am | Friendly advice: Your grasp of the English language is not up to par with the majority of native speakers of the language. This is fine, perhaps it's not your first language or perhaps you have some other reason, I'm not judging you on that. But I'm afraid your unskilled use of the language renders you unable to write a convincing manifesto, or even a coherent one. You should also recognise that a manifesto generally requires a clear and formal style. Your failure to employ such a style is demonstrated by (among other things) your complete failure to understand what emboldening, italicizing and underlining are for.
Less friendly advice: It looks like ComComism is basically about scamming money out of people. Stop that. |
|
|
| |
|
| | dressing | Jul 23, 2:32am | | I'm unable to argue about whether it's a scam because I haven't read most of your manifesto, or understood any of what I did read. I only meant to say that it appears to be a scam at first glance. You are essentially asking people to give you money, right? |
|
|
| |
|
| | dressing | Jul 23, 8:49am | Okay.
So once you have 5500 people you would set up a company, sell each of them 0.01% equity in your company (at what price?), retaining a 45% share for your self. The company will then make money somehow and the shareholders will each take 0.01% of the profit? |
| Is ComComism the new 3rd way?
| |
