Posted on May 19, 2013
Interest
on Oct 24, 2007
Stumblers Who Commented On This Page
gerakis100
Udi
I'm already worried... but I'm sure someone will come up with a solution
Posted on Apr 29, 2013
edwinmiller
Edwin Miller
This is really very informative and very technical explained. However, the problem of Year 2038 will be sort out by fixing some solution that can compatible with this problem.
Posted on Sep 3, 2012
Barnes088
Noneyabidness.
Lol, 32 bit OS in 2038.
Posted on Dec 4, 2009
Jumbles379
Jumbles379
I hope no one is using 32-bit computers in 2038. That would be indicative of a problem bigger than Y2K38.
Posted on Nov 29, 2009
JNCR
Justin
assuming we live past 2012 ;)
Posted on Sep 24, 2009
HusseinNasser
HusseinNasser
Really interesting,
but as the article said, it can be easily fixed at a cost of breaking binary compatibility
Posted on Jul 29, 2009
OmarCaf
Omar
it'a real problem we'are on 2008 come on... ;)
Posted on Mar 9, 2008
Galphanore
Galphanore
CivicSpoon, if you'd actually read anything on the page past the first sentence you would see that it applies to anything with C code in it, which also includes a lot of windows software.
Posted on Jan 12, 2008
mikel2earth
Michael
by 2038 current systems will have been long gone, and the systems of more current 2030ish times will I am sure support 64bit or better time stamps
Posted on Jan 11, 2008
Girl30
EnormousTalent
Another doomsday to look forward to. If all the doomsdays, that should have happened, had happened, the World would be a better place. If the World was still there, that is.
Posted on Jan 10, 2008
msdos464
Niko
From the page: "The year 2038 problem (also known as "Y2K38," "Y2K+38," or "Y2.038K" by analogy to the Y2K problem) may cause some computer software to fail before or in the year 2038. "
Posted on Dec 1, 2007
nangtruongit
Demon Trưởng
Software SEO website top 1st Google,Bing,Yahoo with Rank Builder Neo 2.0 Huge Bonus Over $1200
Click here Download FREE NOW
http://rankbuilder-reviews.com/rank-builder-seo-huge-bonus/